Tweed Amateur Rowing Club

The Tweed Amateur Rowing Club existed at Berwick and their boathouse was located at the end of the Lovers Walk in the town, approximately 100 metres downstream from the Berwick Amateur Rowing Club. Permission was given to build their boathouse in March 1872, three years after the formation of neighbouring Berwick ARC. Tweed A.R.C. club was an amateur club but there were some long-standing issues and confusion with the definition of "professionalism" and whilst gentleman amateurs engaged in non-manual labour generally rowed for Berwick ARC, those whose status was not so defined would row for Tweed ARC. Neil Wigglesworth wrote in "The Social History of English Rowing" that "the Tweed Club had written to London Rowing Club for advice on a constitution and came to the inescapable conclusion that the London rules would require some modification for our use", the modification being that 'amateur' was defined as 'one who has never rowed for money'. This meant that the Tweed Rowing Club members were excluded from the purely gentlemen amateur events at the annual Berwick Amateur Rowing Club regattas. We know the Tweed Amateur Rowing Club was defunct by 1933.

Location of the boathouses of the Tweed ARC and the Berwick ARC

13th September 1872
The Illustrated Berwick Journal received a letter:
Sir, I had written to you that “Amateur athletic sports, open to amateur members of the Berwick Cricket and Rowing Clubs are announced to take place on Friday, or, if the weather should prove unfavourable, on Monday. I am really pleased to see this union of for a common purpose. The programme embraces nine items, and I have no doubt the contest in each case will be pretty keen. If the affair passes off well, proves a success, and pays all expenses, perhaps the trio of clubs will endeavour to make the sports of annual occurrence. No money prizes are offered, therefore all the sports will merely be friendly contests of skill.” I am sorry I have to make an addendum to the above, but it has been stated to me and I give it as I heard, that the members of the Cricket and Berwick Rowing Clubs, some of whom are the Committee of Management, entirely object to the members of the Club competing with them. This singular decision is the more to be regretted and condemned, as (though creatures of toil) the objectors consider themselves men and gentlemen, ramifications of our little aristocracy. Assuming them to be such, they ought to act as becometh men and gentlemen so as not to cast a slur upon what they consider elevates them socially above their fellows. The true gentleman is not only generous and truthful, but is far above meanness, and has an equal manly sympathy for the great and small. To be a true man is to put away childishness and confine oneself to manly actions; and one cannot be a gentleman by "the more style, quality, or colour of his apparel, or the make or number of his watch appendages.

But that is about the mark of it here; and the unmanly trick of stamping the amateurs of the new as “ professionals” merely to get rid of known superiority is an act that carries with it its own condemnation. How does it come that no London or any other boating rules were mentioned at the outset as intended to regulate these field sports? How does it come that bills are published announcing to the public that “Amateur" athletic sports open to amateur members of the Berwick Cricket and Rowing Clubs before ascertaining that who were to oppose them were “professionals" and not "amateurs"? The doings of the new Club have been open to them as well as to others, and they know what they have competed for during the short time they have been organised as a Rowing Club; and although a piece of ambiguity (or a trick) in boating rules may stamp them “ professionals” in the same trick cannot justly be brought to bear upon their eligibility to contest in field sports, got up, as was supposed, with a purely friendly aim to encourage fraternisation. I cannot, for my own part see and those popinjays may impute it to my ignorance if they choose, it will be in keeping with their Samsonic manliness-how the members of the new Club can be “professionals” in a rowing club because some pulled for a trifle of prize-money in salmon punts or water smashers before they were in a Club at all. Forming themselves into a body, under a distinctive title, they began a career having no affinity with the prior doings of its members, and could not be “ professionals” in the strict sense of the term, unless competing for money prizes under the title of the Tweed Amateur Rowing Club. Members of the other are as much professionals as those of the Tweed Club said to be so. If they have not competed for coin money, they have done so for what money alone could purchase — a distinction that will admit of no difference.

Training has been carried on this week in the field where the games are to be held, and it appears to me that the evidence of superiority evinced on the part of the members of the new club has led to the unmanly exclusion of the latter from the contests. I can think of nothing more mean and contemptible than the flat of Tuesday. It may raise the objectors in their own estimation, but the esteem of others cannot be to them so little worth as to make them utterly regardless of the scorn awarded teh resolve that has robbed the sports of all attraction. To be beaten on a "well-foughten field" is no disgrace. There is honour in contesting with a stronger than oneself, even though he be a "cad" or a "fellow", but evade a contest by a mere sleight of hand is the very quintessence of cowardice. This opportunity to create and cement a good feeling between the two clubs should not have been missed. It should have been carefully fostered, but like missing a passage, the opportunity has been missed and may never occur again. It is needless to pursue the matter further. I understand all the members of the new club who had entered for the sports, when they were objected to - after the bills were out - at once withdrew their names. There need be no recrimination about the contemptible affair, and if the new Club can do it, they should just set apart another day for sports of their own and lay them open to athletes of name and ability. "Ne cede Malis!"

28th July 1877
Bell's Life reported:
Tweed Amateur Rowing Club Regatta 1877
This club held their regatta on the usual course, on the great border river, on Monday last, and but for the adverse state of the elements, it would have proved a most successful gathering. As it was, rain began to fall at around 11 0'clock in the forenoon and continued to fall, with little intermission, throughout the remainder of the day. A good programme was issued, and a pretty good muster of people were ready to face the unpleasant atmospheric influences to witness the sport, whilst some interesting contests were witnessed during the afternoon . The following was the result:

The President's Prize
a challenge cup with presentation prizes, presented by Captain D. Milne Home M.P., President of the club, for an open cutter skiff race over 3/4 of a mile.
Final: J. Hogg, Tweed ARC beat R. Neaham Hebburn ARC.

The Tradesmens Plate
a challenge cup with four presentation prizes and medal for coxswain, an open junior four-oared race held over a distance of about a mile.
Final: Tweed ARC (Richardson) beat Tweed ARC (Temple)

The Spittal Cup
A cutter skiff race for local oarsmen, over a distance of half a mile.
Final: Thompson (Tweed ARC) beat Robertson (Tweed ARC) and Garsey (Tweed ARC)

The Crossman Challenge Cup
presented by M.G. Crossman Esq., with presentation prizes and medal for the coxswain, an open foy four-oared race over three-quarters of a mile.
Final: Tweed ARC beat Hebburn ARC with Jarrow ARC in third place.

The Tweedmouth Cup
an open skiff race over a mile.
Final: J. Hogg (Tweed ARC) beat R. Temple (Tweed ARC)

The Coverhill Cup
presented by W. C. Coverhill Esq., - a skiff race for members of the club, over half a mile.
Final: R. Davidson (Tweed ARC) beat A.G. McLoughlin (Tweed ARC)

The Marjoribanks Challenge Cup
presented by Sir D.C. Marjoribanks, Bart, M.P., with presentation prizes and medal for the coxswain, a foy foared-oared race for members of the club over three-quarters of a mile.
Final: Thompson's crew beat Marshall's crew with Rennie's crew in third.

The Paulin Challenge Cup
presented by John L. Paulin Esq., two silver cups to become the property of the pair who may win it three times in succession, with presentation prizes. An open amateur pair oared race over three quarters of a mile.
Final: R. Marshall and R. Temple (Tweed ARC) beat A. Roberston and J. Douglas (Tweed ARC) with A.G. McLoughlin and R.C. Petterson (Tweed ARC) in third place.


1st December 1882
The Berwick Advertiser reported:
The Annual General Meeting of the Tweed ARC was held on Wednesday night in the Waverley Arms. The Treasurer's Statement of Receipts and Expenditure was read and found to be more satisfactory than the previous two years, owing principally to the increase in membership. Lieutenant Colonel D. Milne Home was elected President, H.F.H. Jerningham Esq. MP and Sir M. White Ridley MP, Vice -presidents for the ensuing year. Captain Mr. T. Garvey.

20th July 1885
The Berwick Advertiser received a letter:
Sir, in your issue of yesterday's date, you state in your introductory remarks to the Tweed ARC Regatta "that two Tyne crews had entered for the races but had scratched owing to some vexed question, the status of some of the members of the Tweed Amateur Rowing Club in the sporting world, it being held that because some of them had rowed for money in gigs at previous regattas at Tweedmouth Feast they are virtually "professionals" and therefore ineligible to race with amateurs, who have never competed for anything other than prizes of any kind. It is true that the Tyne crews scratched on this misunderstanding but it is not true that any member of Tweed ARC ever rowed for money at any Tweedmouth Feast Regatta and I must ask you to give publicity to this fact, in order that the interests of the Tweed Amateur Rowing Club may not be damaged in the sporting world. It is a fact that the Club is now purely amateur, with the exception laid out in the 5th clause of the 21st section of the rules issued by the Amateur Rowing Association and if this question was properly looked into, it is doubtful whether there would be any of the Clubs on the Tyne or the Tweed left as amateurs. It may well be mentioned here that the Tynemouth Amateur Rowing Club (one of the two who scratched) has since come to the conclusion that the Tweed ARC is not a "professional" Club but owing to their inability to get their men together again after ceasing training when they heard the "professional" report, they could not send a crew down and were therefore compelled to retire. To confirm this, they have given us an invitation to compete in their regatta on the 15th proxime. I therefore beg of you in all fairness to the Tweed Amateur Rowing Club and the public alike, to insert this in your first issue. Jas. R. Dickinson, Hon Secretary, Tweed ARC

2nd August 1892
The Berwickshire News and General Advertiser reported:
It must be admitted, however much it would be otherwise desired, that silence reigns over matters aquatic as far as the Tweed is concerned. That the regatta has had its palmy days is patent to every townsman, who need no far recollections to call up the names of many who, in the manipulation of the sculls, could bid defiance to the talent of the Tyne, and establish a sport on Tweedside which at that time gave promise of a long and successful career. But slowly and surely, matters have been on the ebb tide, and save for a fitful burst now and then, the rowing prowess of the Tweed ARC has been relegated to a back seat on favour of athletics. The sport of this Club on Monday were no exception to the general declension, the affair being poorly managed and the racing itself of a very poor order. The course was from Ballast Quay to Castle Vale. Mr. Jas. Young acted as Starter and Mr. Jno. Cavanagh and Mr. T Hariday as Judge and Referee respectively.